CASE STUDY

Improving the Exploration at Wikiloc

Better trail discovery and recommendations

Xavier MorrosXavier Morros
Jose NotarioJose Notario
KaiKai
Mònica FollanaMònica Follana
·
Product DesignResearchAI Prototyping
New Wikiloc exploration experience across desktop and mobile

CONTEXT

Content discoverability: a key driver of Wikiloc's growth

As product designer, I led the discovery and design work in close collaboration with product, data, engineering, support, and company leadership. My role covered user research, information architecture, concept testing, interaction design, and the definition of a scalable landing-page system.

Web-to-app traffic was a key driver of Wikiloc's growth. For many users, the first touchpoint with Wikiloc is a trail search through a search engine or AI service, followed by a visit to one of Wikiloc's SEO landing pages. Well-optimised landing pages are therefore critical for attracting relevant traffic to Wikiloc.

Wikiloc's landing pages are generated programmatically and organised through a hierarchy of geographic entities: countries → regions → places. This produces tens of millions of activity-and-location pages targeting searches such as “hiking trails in Paris” or “MTB trails in Madrid”.

Wikiloc's user acquisition funnel, from search engines and AI platforms at the awareness stage down to app downloads at conversion

Wikiloc's acquisition journey, from search visibility to app conversion

THE OPPORTUNITY

Leveraging new growth opportunities

Some Wikiloc stakeholders believed that users had content-discovery needs that were not being addressed.

In particular, potential new users arriving from search engines and AI services were looking for trails passing through points of interest (POIs), such as Mont Blanc or Blue Lake. At the time, Wikiloc did not have POI-focused landing pages, which meant missing a potentially valuable source of organic traffic.

Google search results for landmark queries like 'lakes in Catalonia' and 'castles in Catalonia', showing no Wikiloc results appearing

Search results for POI-related queries in which Wikiloc was absent

Working closely with my product manager, I shaped an initial strategic proposal around a primary Job to Be Done: helping POI-seeking users find relevant trails.

The high-level goal was to improve content discoverability across search engines and AI services, supporting the full web-to-app conversion journey: sign-ups, downloads, trials, and subscriptions.

DISCOVERY KICKOFF

Gaining insight into the problem space

Although I had an initial hypothesis to explore, I first needed a broader understanding of how people discovered content across Wikiloc. One critical question guided the discovery phase: were POI pages the real opportunity, or one symptom of a wider findability problem?

To answer it, I investigated what users searched for, how they discovered relevant trails, and how they browsed and interacted with Wikiloc's content when planning an outdoor activity.

#1. Understanding how users find content on Wikiloc

I recruited six active Wikiloc users and interviewed them to better understand how they searched for outdoor activities.

Analysing the main observations through empathy maps revealed several recurring themes:

“Once I'm in a place, I search for interesting spots to visit in that area.”

“I try to make sure the trail passes through natural landmarks such as rivers or lakes.”

“I search for trails near my city, such as trails in Barcelona or trails in Madrid.”

“Once I'm in a place, I search for trails that pass through popular places.”

These conversations formed the following key insights:

Exploratory seeking

Users may know the type of activity or general area they are interested in, but lack enough context to make a precise search. Wikiloc did not provide an effective way to explore content when the destination was still open-ended.

Known-item seeking

The most common scenario occurred when users already had a place in mind and wanted to reach relevant content quickly—for example, “hiking trails in Barcelona”.

Different search particularities

Some users searched not only by location, but also for routes passing through landmarks or specific points of interest. Wikiloc did not provide reliable results for these searches.

On the spot search

Some users began searching only after arriving at a destination. In these situations, discovery was highly contextual and focused on nearby options.

#2. Understanding what users search for

Once I understood how users searched on Wikiloc, I needed to identify the types of content they were looking for. This quantitative analysis complemented the interview findings.

The data manager extracted the top 1,000 queries from Wikiloc's internal search and the leading organic queries from Google Search Console. I used AI to help classify each query by search-intent type.

Breakdown of user search intent types, with toponymic and landmark searches together making up over 60% of queries

Search-intent categories from queries that led users to Wikiloc

The analysis showed that users arrived at Wikiloc through searches related to:

Landmarks

Users looked for trails passing through generic geographic features such as rivers, caves, or lakes.

Points of interest

Users struggled to find trails passing through specific places such as Pic du Midi or Mont Blanc.

Place names

The largest group of queries included place names such as Barcelona or “trails in Madrid”.

Wikiloc brand

Some users searched directly for Wikiloc or the Wikiloc app, indicating existing brand awareness.

This confirmed the initial hypothesis that Wikiloc did not adequately serve some important search intents, as the product had no POI- or landmark-focused landing pages.

#3. Assessing Wikiloc’s content structure

I also needed to understand how this new content could fit into Wikiloc's existing information architecture, so I took the initiative to run a tree test after each interview using Usabilitree.

The goal was to assess content findability across the existing website. Participants were asked to locate trails in different places using the site's content hierarchy.

Tree test results showing completion rate, time taken, directness score, and a task-by-task success breakdown

Tree test to assess Wikiloc content structure

The test showed that most participants struggled to complete the proposed tasks. After analysing the results with the team, I formed the hypothesis that the underlying issue was the site's content structure. I therefore audited Wikiloc's information architecture.

The audit revealed two fundamental issues with the way trail content was organised:

A structure that was too deep

To reach a specific place, users first needed to know its country and region. This made unfamiliar destinations particularly difficult to find.

An organisation that was too narrow

Content could only be explored geographically, preventing users from discovering it through landmarks, activity types, or other meaningful relationships.

REFRAMING THE PROBLEM

The opportunity was bigger than POI landing pages

User interviews and search analysis reinforced the initial hypothesis: Wikiloc was not surfacing some of the content users were actively looking for.

However, the tree tests showed that the problem went deeper. The content structure was both too narrow and too deep, making relevant pages difficult to reach.

Together with the product manager, I reframed the original POI opportunity as a broader content-discoverability challenge.

With this in mind, a crucial question emerged:

How might we help people discover relevant outdoor content, even when they do not know exactly what to search for?

This became the core challenge. Wikiloc did not offer users a seamless way to explore and discover content, so I needed to rethink more than a single type of landing page.

SETTING THE VISION

Figuring out what to build

Based on these findings, I believed the answer did not lie in adding chatbots or questionnaires, but in improving Wikiloc's existing information architecture.

Working closely with the product manager, I defined three strategic directions and presented them to the wider team for validation:

#1. Add POI and landmark-based organisation

Expand the existing geographic model so users can reach trails through landmarks and specific points of interest.

#2. Improve the exploration experience

Help users who do not yet know exactly what they want to find by presenting relevant and popular options within the same geographic area.

#3. Improve Wikiloc's content structure

Create clearer relationships between countries, regions, places, activities, and POIs so users can navigate across the site more naturally.

THE FRAMEWORK

Setting the design direction

I worked closely with the CEO, product manager, and engineering team to progress from low- to high-fidelity explorations, drawing on competitor analysis and information-architecture patterns from adjacent industries.

Ongoing communication and collaboration were essential. I also checked in regularly with the support team to compare the proposals with the concerns and suggestions they had received from customers over time.

Benchmarking exploration patterns across competitors

Before proposing changes, I analysed how other outdoor platforms organised content on their exploration pages: where they placed key actions, how they created visual hierarchy, and how their wayfinding helped users reach relevant content.

This allowed me to identify several areas where Wikiloc's content strategy and presentation could be improved.

Weak visual hierarchy

Important content, imagery, and actions did not stand out clearly enough.

Lack of content variety

Competitors offered more ways to explore content by theme, activity, place, and point of interest.

Competitive content mapping of AllTrails, Outdooractive, and Komoot exploration pages

Functional content mapping

A top-down approach

One of the first major design challenges I faced was deciding how to introduce the new exploration and POI pages into a fragmented information architecture.

The product manager and I began by redefining the content architecture at a system level. Once the relationships and user flows were clear, I moved on to the interaction and layout models for the new exploration experience and POI-focused landing pages.

New information architecture flowing from main exploration to country, region, city, and point-of-interest level landing pages

Connecting exploration pages across country, region, city, and POI levels

Testing early prototypes

I ran a series of concept tests on early prototypes to build a better understanding of the needs and pain points to address, focusing on the most significant change: the new Exploration page. To test the concept with users, I built a quick functional prototype that brought the emerging information architecture and interaction model to life.

Functional prototype used during early concept testing

I explored different arrangements of UI, functional, and data elements, as well as the interactions connecting them. Starting broad allowed the vision to evolve into a tangible design language and a consistent anatomy for the new pages.

Selection of visual explorations for the exploration landings, activity landings, and POI pages

Selected visual explorations for the new landing-page system

A many-legged creature

The confidence with which I initially defined the problem and outlined an end-to-end proposal proved slightly naive. As the work progressed, I uncovered a system with many connected parts and dependencies:

  • The architecture had to scale across country, region, city, activity, and POI pages.
  • New relationships between trails, locations, and landmarks had to remain understandable to users.
  • The same patterns needed to work consistently across desktop and mobile.
  • SEO requirements, content taxonomy, reusable components, and engineering constraints had to evolve together.

The design system saw a flurry of updates during this period. I used the opportunity to consolidate new UI—including trail and waypoint cards—along with reusable interaction patterns.

Updated design system components used across the new exploration and landing pages

Design system updates

SOLUTION

One exploration system, multiple ways to discover

The final solution expanded Wikiloc's geographic hierarchy into a broader exploration system. It connected countries, regions, cities, activities, and points of interest, allowing users to move naturally between different levels and discover relevant trails even without a precise query in mind.

Making geographic pages useful for exploration

I redesigned the geographic landing pages to go beyond lists of trails. Activity filters, community favourites, popular places, and map access offered different starting points while preserving the strong location context that already supported organic search.

Final design of the exploration landing for Spain, showing popular trails and places within the community

A geographic landing page combining direct trail access with exploratory content

Turning points of interest into discovery gateways

The new POI-focused pages connected landmarks with nearby places and trails passing through them. This addressed an unmet search intent while giving users the context they needed to evaluate an unfamiliar destination.

Final design of the Pica d'Estats POI landing page, showing nearby summits and trails passing through it

POI-focused landing page connecting a landmark with nearby summits and trails

Overview of the final exploration system, including POI, activity, regional, and global landing pages

The wider exploration system across POI, activity, regional, and global landing pages

IMPACT

Expanding organic reach and shortening paths to content

After launch, the new POI-focused pages created dedicated destinations for landmark and POI searches that Wikiloc had not previously served. This expanded Wikiloc's organic footprint and produced a measurable uplift in traffic across the newly covered search intents.

Organic uplift across newly covered POI and landmark searches

Broader coverage through a new content category for underserved search intents

Lower navigation depth with more direct paths to relevant trails

*Exact figures and absolute volumes have been withheld to protect confidential business data.

At product level, the new information architecture created more direct paths to relevant trails and established a scalable foundation for future landing pages, activities, and geographic entities.

FINAL REFLECTION

Discovery reframed the opportunity

One of the main learnings from this project was the value of investing time in discovery before jumping to solutions. The initial hypothesis pointed at a missing content type (POI landings). But the real problem was broader: the content structure itself was limiting users' ability to explore.

Without the user interviews and tree tests, I might have designed a solution for a symptom rather than the underlying issue. The discovery phase gave me the confidence to propose a more systemic change—one that the team and stakeholders could align around.

It also reinforced something I carry into every project: framing the right problem is often more valuable than immediately executing a solution. Once the problem was clearly defined, the design decisions became much more focused.

Xavier Morros ©2026, World

Powered by 🍏🍎 from Lleida